acts 10 and the hebrew rights movement

The  Myth I will be talking about is acts 10 Peter vision.

IN The past I had listen to debates about those in The Hrm would say that This vision is about Gentiles Being made clean and having nothing to do with Food, they get this idea from where peter says and I see now that I should call no man common or unclean.

They use this as a proof text but they fail to understand Is HOW they were made clean!

God told peter Go and kill and eat, He was given a direct command by God saying peter I want you to Kill and eat ok? This is a huge problem for The HRM view Because, it would not fit within there view that this passage is about Gentiles, nothing to do with animals it self.

If we go with The HRM this part of The passage comes meaninglessness.

then a voice told him, “Get up, Peter. Kill and eat.”

14 “Surely not, Lord!” Peter replied. “I have never eaten anything impure or unclean.”

15 The voice spoke to him a second time, “Do not call anything impure that God has made clean.”

16 This happened three times, and immediately the sheet was taken back to heaven.

Do you Get The Point? The HRM view would be, God is saying kill and eat gentiles Because this passage has nothing to do with animals being made clean.

so The question The HRM needs to ask them self was God Just kidding when he said to peter Kill and eat?

The truth of The matter is this! that acts 10 God shows all kinds of unclean things and then tells peter Kill and eat, peter replies back NO I will never eat anything not clean! God replies I had made it clean!

Do you get the point, The HRM needs to twist this passage to their ways but if we just let it read out as in it written, well it does not support The HRM.

God made these animals Clean! that why peter can say Now I see that I should call no man common or unclean.

So anyone read this, you have a choice to side with the HRM or simple let this passage read for it self!